Monday, November 14, 2016

“Lord, Lord, Didn’t we Hear this Last Week?”: Judgment in the Sermon on the Mount (the Sequel) ~ Matthew 7:21-2 (Sermon on the Mount series)



21“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven. 22On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many deeds of power in your name?’ 23Then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; go away from me, you evildoers.’ 24“Everyone then who hears these words of mine and acts on them will be like a wise man who built his house on rock. 25The rain fell, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, but it did not fall, because it had been founded on rock. 26And everyone who hears these words of mine and does not act on them will be like a foolish man who built his house on sand. 27The rain fell, and the floods came, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell—and great was its fall!” 28Now when Jesus had finished saying these things, the crowds were astounded at his teaching, 29for he taught them as one having authority, and not as their scribes. ~ Matthew 7:21-29

Okay, I know, I know, that I’m the movie guy – that annoying guy who always makes analogies, references, outright plagiarisms of films but I simply can’t help myself. This week, as I tackled this text I heard another voice: “No not Clint Eastwood but the Movie guy voice: “Last week at Montecito Covenant Church – Jesus gave us warnings to walk the narrow way, to watch out for wolves and to be mindful and discerning of good fruit. And this week, hold on to your hat, he’s doing it again.” So we continue in the same vein of listening to Jesus’ words and our three points from last week are worth repeating:

1.    Jesus said what we are reading today so we can trust that it is for our benefit.
2.    Jesus lived what he was saying – both the practices that he preached on as well as the warnings that he gave – he saw only few following him and was betrayed by wolves in sheep’s clothing.
3.    Finally, Jesus does the sermon on the mount. He is the one who judges fruit. He is the one who cuts down trees. He is the one who does for us what we shouldn’t do and accomplishes for us what we can’t do.
And here we are again . . .  So what else can we learn about with respect to Jesus & judgment, part II, the sequel?

          1.    First, there’s a warning: Don’t be a stranger. 

Jesus’ warning certainly would resonate with Evangelicals – he points to the issue of relationship. That we must both know and be known by Him. But HOW that happens should cause us a bit of discomfort because these people claim to know him – “Lord, lord!,” they exclaim and Jesus rebuffs them.
So the intimacy of relationship with Jesus is framed not by mere recognition (“Lord, Lord”), nor simply private devotion (just hearing the words or having a quiet time of Bible reading), nor large works of power (social or political activism) but by both hearing and doing the sermon on the mount. So we need to notice two things about Jesus’ understanding of intimacy.

            a.    Intimacy is personal but not private.

Intimacy with Jesus demands a personal investment and begins with myself not others. It’s not about changing the world first – it’s about hearing and acting in way that allows for ourselves to be changed by him.
It’s about personally blessing the poor and the poor in spirit, being humble, hungering and thirsting for righteousness and being persecuted on his account. It’s addressing my anger, avoiding my lust, taking my thoughts seriously, being faithful in my marriage, telling the truth, and being reconciled to my enemies. It’s giving and praying in secret for “us” and not merely “I.” It’s not worrying, not judging, not hoarding. In fact, my own person becomes a critical measure for carrying out the sermon because Jesus commands that I do unto others as I would have them do unto me.

Image result for Dorothy Day 
The famous Catholic activist and agitator, Dorothy Day, toward the end of her life said it this way: “The older I get, the more I meet people, the more convinced I am that we must only work on ourselves, to grow in grace. The only thing we can do about people is to love them.” It often forces me to look inwardly so I can act outwardly. It's work that demands that I listen to Jesus, I do what he says, and that I ask and receive help from him (Matt. 6:9-13). It's a refusal to separate love from obedience and refusal to separate fighting evil from my own inward demons of hate, violence, greed, etc.
 

            b.    It’s active but not grandiose – it’s small. 

What strikes me about these tasks in the sermon on the mount is that they seem so small given the problems of our world. The false prophets problems are not that they are passive but seem to be that they imagine that what will change the world by doing big things for God that don’t require personal commitment. Note: none of their activities are mentioned by Jesus in the sermon on the mount.
So these false prophets are doing big stuff but it’s not the right stuff. And Jesus responds, “Who are you?” So the sermon on the mount also implies that following Jesus is often small work. Mother Theresa offers us a brilliant retelling of what I’m trying to say. She says, “We can do not great things, only small things with great love. It is not how much you do but how much love you put into doing it. Above our front door, we have hung a sign that says, “Today . . . small things with great love (or don’t open the door).”

How does this understanding of intimacy impact our identity? Well – imagine if I wanted to join the vegetarian society. And they said, “Okay great here is who we are, what we stand for, and what we do.” And I replied, “That’s great – I love what you do and I even bought a t-shirt and bumper sticker but I'm not so interested in your rigid rules of eating only vegetables every day. However, I can create multi-media advertisements for your group to get your message out.” Admittedly that might be helpful, I might know the lingo, talk a good game, but it wouldn’t make me one of them.

          2.    There’s an invitation: God’s real estate is for “everyone.”

First, despite Jesus’ warnings of only a “few” followers, false prophets, and bad trees – Jesus’ invitation is for “everyone” (vs. 24). The real estate option for a nice solid bit of property to build your house upon is available to anyone who wants to pay the price. You can afford it but are you willing to pay for it?

Second, the foundation isn’t revealed by the size or glamour of the house. Nothing is said about any differences between the two houses other than the foundation of rock or sand. Guess what a building inspector calls a small house on a bad foundation?  Condemned. Guess what a building inspector calls an enormous mansion with vaulted ceilings, a pool, and a four car garage on a bad foundation? Beautifully, condemned – and “How great will be there fall!,” Jesus says. Our houses, in other words, are similar to the sheep’s clothing that we talked about last week. They can be our camouflage that we try to use to inflate or hide who we really are.  We need to resist a world, a spirituality, which says, “Your reputation, your life, your destiny, is determined by the size of your house.” Friends, I also want to clearly state that it’s not about the color of your house either. Some of you – your candidate won the White House. Some of you – your candidate didn’t. Both of you better build on the right foundation. Both of you better “do to others as you would have them do to you.” Both of you better hear and do what he said to us. Both of you should remember that you are neither Republican or Democrat, red or blue, but a follower of Jesus. Worry about what you’re building on and everything else will fall into place. Our houses can look different. Our foundations will not. And some of us need to stop fussing over architectural plans and start building even if we don’t know exactly where everything goes.

Third, it’s also important to remember that the foundation doesn’t change the weather and bad weather is coming. Following Jesus in this life will not save you from the storms. Let me say that again, “Following Jesus will not save you from the storms.” So why do we imagine that storms reflect who people are. I remember a woman who said to me when I was leaving for California, “I don’t know why anyone would move there. They have horrible earthquakes and expect us tax payers to pay for their homes when they fall.” Of course, she failed to mention the ever-present floods and tornadoes that hit Texas on a regular basis. Storms don’t reflect our choices, they reveal them. Illus. Story of the flood in my friend’s community – who shared with whom, who opened to whom?

          3.    There’s a promise: You will be surprised and astounded (NOT afraid)

It should be telling that the response of the crowd does not actually resemble the response that many of us sort of feel about Jesus’ words. We might be afraid, or annoyed, they are “astounded.” Why? Jacob Neusner a famous Jewish scholar and rabbi clues us in. He wrote a book about Jesus called A Rabbi talks with Jesus, which explores how a faithful follower of Judaism would hear Jesus’ words on the sermon of the mount. Interestingly, Neusner says that the ethic of Jesus doesn’t bother him. He appreciates Jesus’ teachings and hears in Jesus, for the most part, an acceptable, though arguable, interpretation of Torah (the law or first five books of the Hebrew Scriptures).

What does concern Neusner, however, remains the astounding language that Jesus employs for speaking of this ethic. He writes, “Yes, I would have been astonished. Here is a Torah-teacher who says in his own name what the Torah says in God’s name . . . we now recognize that at issue is the figure of Jesus, not the teachings at all.” In a later interview, Neusner declared that Jesus’ attitude to Torah made him want to ask: “Who do you think you are? God?”

The focus of the parable about the two foundations, Jesus says, is about “my words.” In vss. 24 and 26 he focuses not on the Old Testament but “these my words” – with the emphasis in the Greek on “my” which is placed first. In fact, our whole passage can almost be summed up by Jesus’ “my.” Entering the kingdom of heaven is about doing the will of “my Father” (7:21). Those who are not obedient are told “go away from me” (7:23). And the will of the Father and one’s entrance into that kingdom directly relate to “my words.”

Gandhi, whom I deeply respect and who truly challenged Christian visions of the sermon on the mount by actually showing that the principles worked once said, “I have never been interested in a historical Jesus. I should not care if it was proved by someone that the man called Jesus never lived, and that what was narrated in the Gospels was a figment of the writer’s imagination. For the Sermon on the Mount would still be true for me.”

The problem with Gandhi’s remarks, of course, is that Jesus’ ethic, his position in the sermon on the mount, all stemmed from an understanding of who he was, which allows him to say these seemingly bombastic things – these warnings about the future in which he himself is the judge. These aren’t simply ethical teachings – they are connected to what theologians refer to as eschatology – the end that Jesus determines. 

In the end (signaled by the phrase “On that day” (vs. 22), the Christian message is that it is Jesus who decides and determines our destiny. And Jesus can claim that authority and power because of who he is. It reminds us of where we began – the who is as important as the what or the how.

No comments: