17 As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?” 18 “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. 19 You know the commandments: ‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, you shall not defraud, honor your father and mother.’” 20 “Teacher,” he declared, “all these I have kept since I was a boy.” 21 Jesus looked at him and loved him. “One thing you lack,” he said. “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.” 22 At this the man’s face fell. He went away sad, because he had great wealth. 23 Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God!” 24 The disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus said again, “Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God! 25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” 26 The disciples were even more amazed, and said to each other, “Who then can be saved?” 27 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but not with God; all things are possible with God.” ~ Mark 10:17-27
My wife is a historian at Westmont College and teaches a
variety of courses, like World History. In one of her lectures she begins a
discussion on the Renaissance by introducing students to Hans Holbein’s The
Ambassadors (1533) and asks a deceptively simple question: “What do you see
that is Renaissance?”
The students point out learned men with books and
instruments. They notice objects like a celestial globe, a portable sundial and
various other scientific instruments as well as others objects revealing a
unique moment in European culture and art.
On the surface they see a beautifully detailed Renaissance
painting (perspective, realism, humanism and new learning) but my wife then
points out that if they will pay more careful attention an even richer piece of
art begins to emerge that illustrates a more complicated historical drama of
discord, division, religious wars, and death.
- A crucifix is half-obscured by a green curtain in the top left corner of the painting, symbolizing the division of the church due to the Protestant Reformation.
- A broken string on the lute symbolizes ecclesiastical discord.
- The open book of music next to the lute is a Lutheran hymnal, and the book of mathematics, to its left, is open to a page titled “Dividirt” or “divide” in Latin.
- Finally, there is the anamorphic skull. While its skewed perspective renders the skull largely unreadable when viewed straight-on, it was painted to be seen from the side so that a viewer walking past would be confronted with the grinning face of death.
Our story today in Mark is like that painting. It intends
to be a rich and realistic depiction of discipleship, focused on wealth, while
at the same time expressing a no-less-important symbolic seriousness about the
kingdom of God and the challenge of following Jesus. It is, by Jesus’ own
admission, a life that is both “impossible” and “possible” (vs. 27).
And like Holbein’s painting, I want to walk you through
some of the details, a few of the subtleties, ask some questions, and look at
it with a sideways glance, so that we, like the disciples in our story, can be “amazed.”
Let’s tour this richly detailed, impossible “what!?” together step-by-step.
17 As Jesus started on
his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,”
he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
·
Everywhere
else in Mark when a person kneels down to
implore Jesus, they are asking for
healing for themselves or for someone else. Is Mark depicting this scene as a
healing and inviting us to do the same? Perhaps, we are asked to imagine that
the man is sick and just doesn’t know it. Looked at this way, the story aims to
expose sickness. Perhaps Jesus’ words are a radical diagnosis of a deep-seated
illness and need. What would it mean to hear this story not as “try harder” but
“be healed”?
18 “Why do you call me
good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone.
·
Why
does Jesus object to being called “good”? Does he think the man is merely
trying to flatter him? Possibly, but I wonder instead if Jesus is suggesting
that something is amiss with the man’s question itself. Once you imagine that
eternal life is something you inherit or earn by being good, you’re already misdiagnosing
the problem. No one is good -- that is, really and truly whole -- apart from
God. It’s interesting that we currently use the word “good” to mean that we
need nothing. Yet, we are all tragically broken, incapable of fixing
ourselves. Which means both that no one is “good enough” to inherit eternal
life and that entering the kingdom is finally not about “being good” in the
first place.
19 You know the
commandments: ‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall
not steal, you shall not give false testimony, you shall not defraud, honor
your father and mother.’” 20 “Teacher,”
he declared, “all these I have kept since I was a boy.”
- Is the man overconfident in his ability to keep the commandments? Is he smug, self-satisfied, or self-righteous? Perhaps, but I’m not so sure. Not only are the commandments considered in Judaism absolutely “do-able,” but Jesus seems to accept his statement at face value. Jesus does not devalue the commandments but starts by naming them as important elements. Rules are an important part of life, Jesus says. We will see, however, that they are not sufficient to constitute a relationship. One can keep them and still not follow Jesus.
- However, there is another interesting point. All of the commandments that Jesus recites have to do with human beings in relationship with each other. The first four commandments that address a human being’s relationship with God are not mentioned. Yet one command is different: “You shall not defraud” (v. 19). “Do not defraud” replaces the last commandment: “You shall not covet” (Exodus 20:17; Deuteronomy 5:21). Neither Luke nor Matthew includes it in their versions of this story. Is the switch maybe Mark’s way of identifying the motive behind coveting? Is he pointing out the root cause of fraudulent economic practices? This change only exists in Mark’s Gospel. Or, is Mark providing an explanation for how the man acquired his fortune and indicting an economic system that takes advantage of the least in its society?
- If fraudulent practices are indeed the source of the man’s wealth, the man does not acknowledge it nor does he even recognize it as such. Instead, he insists that he has “kept” them all since he was young. Regardless, whether his wealth is legitimate or not, it does not have the power to purchase what he seeks.
21 Jesus looked at him
and loved him. “One thing you lack,” he said. “Go, sell everything you
have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come,
follow me.”
·
Jesus loves this
man. He’s the only person in the entire Gospel of Mark singled out as being
loved by Jesus. He does not treat him poorly or mock him. Every interpretation
we may offer must therefore take seriously Jesus' absolute regard and
unconditional love for this man, whether guilty or not.
·
Despite being
loved by Jesus (or is it because of it), Jesus confronts this man with a demand
which he has not made on his other wealthy followers, such as the hospitable
family of Mary, Martha and Lazarus (Luke 10:38-42; John 12:1-3), the wealthy
wife of Chuza (Luke 8:3), the “rich man” Joseph of Arimathea (Matthew 27:57),
or even Zacchaeus, who gave away only half his wealth plus restitutions (Luke
19:8). This is the only time in Mark's Gospel that Jesus makes such a demand
about possessions. Although he calls everyone to radical renunciation (8:34-37;
10:28-31), the particularities of discipleship vary across the Gospel. And he
is not asked simply to give away his wealth, but to give it to the poor (not
the church either, mind you). Implied is the importance of sharing in the
hardships and need of one's fellow human beings is a part of life in the
kingdom.
·
I have sometimes been asked by people, even
nonbelievers, that if they follow Jesus will they also be required to sell all
their possessions and give the money to the poor. And I tell them, “Maybe. Talk
to Jesus.” I like the comment made by my former colleague at Westmont College
Dr. Bob Gundry: “That Jesus did not command all his followers to sell all their
possessions gives comfort only to the kind of people to whom he would issue
that command.”
22 At this the man’s face fell. He
went away sad, because he had great wealth.
· Despite being uniquely loved by the Jesus, the man just
walks away. How terribly shocking to discover that a dearly loved one can walk
away – even from Jesus. Mark seems to
pause here in his relentless challenge to give a nod toward the tragedy of
discipleship.
·
What is the challenge of discipleship? “Sadness.”
The man
departs Jesus, “sad, because he had great wealth.” We don’t know
exactly what happens with the rich man after this exchange; does he weep and
then go and sell what he has and follow Jesus, or does he stop following Jesus
and go to tend his possessions? The text does not say. I want to suggest that
this is intentional, leaving the tension for the reader to wrestle with
herself. And at the core of that wrestling, is the problem of “sadness,” and
discipleship, the challenge of emotional investment in things other than Jesus.
Here’s the thing. You will experience “sadness” when you follow Jesus. He will
rightly look you in the eye and name that thing that owns you, that “because”
which you don’t want to give up. It’s not a question of “if” but of “when.”
Mark’s question could be put this way: “When Jesus makes you sad, will you walk
away too?”
23 Jesus looked around
and said to his disciples, “How hard it is for
the rich to enter the kingdom of God!” 24 The
disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus
said again, “Children, how hard it is to enter
the kingdom of God! 25 It is
easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is
rich to enter the kingdom of God.”
- For centuries, many Christians have tried to make the impossible possible by means other than God’s grace. A ninth-century interpreter made up the idea of a low gate into Jerusalem called "the eye of the needle," through which camels could only pass only if stooped and unladen. Presumably, then, Jesus criticizes only the proud rich, or only the rich who are not extremely determined to enter the kingdom. Unfortunately, no such gate ever existed, and Jesus' words in 10:23-25 fail to recognize such distinctions about wealthy people's attitudes. The eye of the needle is not a one in a thousand shot – it is, Jesus will later diagnose, an impossibility.
- The rich man is not the only one who is shocked by Jesus’ pronouncement (verses 22, 26). So also are all those within earshot. Given that wealth was considered a sign of blessing in the first century (as well as, I'd argue, in the twenty-first), Jesus words to this man and his later statement about the difficulty the rich will have in entering the kingdom are alarming.
- Why, precisely, is it difficult for the rich to enter the kingdom (verse 24-25)? Is it the temptation to believe that one is made self-sufficient by one's wealth with no need for God or others? Is it that one is desensitized to one’s own needs as well as those of others by wealth? Can it be that wealth in some way distances us from one of the elements of being human itself -- that is, the inescapable dimension of being dependent on others? I don’t think that Jesus is teaching that wealth is evil but I do know this – it’s dangerous.
26 The
disciples were even more amazed, and said to each other, “Who then can be
saved?” 27 Jesus looked at them
and said, “With man this is impossible, but not with
God; all things are possible with God.”
- The disciples are shocked by Jesus’ pronouncement and g(r)asp the right question, “Then who can be saved?” If Jesus has categorically ruled out the rich, then can anyone make it into God's kingdom? When we consider all that commends the rich man in this passage, Jesus stuns us by putting the kingdom of God so far out of reach.
- Maybe, then, this passage is not so unique in its demands, for it is not that different from other passages in which Jesus describes a life of discipleship, such as 8:34-37. The rich man's story and Jesus' over-the-top joke of a camel and a needle remind us that all aspects of what it means to follow Jesus should rankle our deeply ingrained instincts toward self-preservation and security. Jesus does not try to deprive the rich man of his money and power. He asks for more. He tries to claim the man's very own self. And in return promises the impossible.
- If that’s true then my failure is more than a “won’t” but a “can’t” and the answer is not so much more “sacrifice” but more “surrender.”