38 “You have heard that it was said,
‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’ 39 But I say to
you, do not resist an evildoer. But if anyone strikes you on the right cheek,
turn the other also; 40 and if anyone wants to sue you and take
your shirt, give your coat as well; 41 and if anyone forces you
to go one mile, go also the second mile. 42 Give to everyone
who begs from you, and do not refuse anyone who wants to borrow from you. 43 “You
have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your
enemy.’ 44 But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for
those who persecute you, 45 so that you may be children of your
Father in heaven; for he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and
sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous. 46 For if
you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax
collectors do the same? 47 And if you greet only your brothers
and sisters, what more are
you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? 48 Be
perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect. ~ Matthew 5:38-48
In a memorable graduation speech, the
scholar James Ryan articulated five basic questions that he believed helped
foster a fulfilling life. The first of these questions, he said, was prominent
among teenagers: “Wait! What?” He admitted that his kids typically posed this
question when he was asking them to do a chore. They hear “blah blah blah . . .
clean your room” and then quickly respond, “Wait! What?” But “Wait! What?,” he
said, is not a bad a question. It’s an important way of asking for
clarification and a question that one should ask before drawing conclusions or
making a decision. It’s the proper pause for when we hear something that
doesn’t quite seem to make sense or that challenges a traditional way of
thinking. That makes it a great phrase for when we read our Bibles. Our text
today finds us in the Sermon on the Mount, Matt. 5:38-48. Where Jesus begins by
citing the “law of retaliation” recorded in Exodus 21:24, Leviticus 24:20, and
Deuteronomy 19:21. That teaching was not a relishing of violence or even a
promoting of it so much, as offering reciprocity. Its aim was to limit the kind
of vengeance one could enact but counseled violence nonetheless. But Jesus
announces to his followers that this teaching is being upgraded, “But I say to
you, do not resist an evil doer” (vs. 39). And the appropriate response is . .
. Wait! What?
Wait! What is he saying in vs. 39? What are we NOT to do?
Is Jesus counseling us to do nothing in the face of aggression, to accept
violence and shame with no recourse? Should we counsel a woman experiencing
abuse, for example, to simply “turn the other cheek”? Does such advice make
sense of Jesus’ ministry? He did resist evil doers but without violence. So
whatever interpretation we have must make sense of his teachings in light of
his actions, his life and his death, which were forms of resistance against
evil. As we begin you’ll
notice that you have a card in your bulletin. This is here to help us remember that we are
learning something that Jesus intends us to do.
Jesus argues that
we are to resist but not retaliate.
Jesus is not suggesting “Don’t resist” but “Don’t resist in this way.” The Greek word “resist” [antistenai] often refers to violent
rebellion or retaliation. Over 50 percent of its use in the Greek version of
the Old Testament, called the Septuagint,
refers to opposition with physical force. Stasis,
the noun form of stenai, means “a
stand,” in the military sense of facing off against an enemy. It came to mean a
“violent rebellion,” or “revolt.” It’s the term used for Barabbas’s
“insurrection” in Mark 15:7 (Luke 23:19, 25), “rioting” in Acts 19:40, and
“violent dissension” in Acts 23:10. Furthermore, the word “evil” in the Greek
can be translated as “the evil one” or “by evil means.” Greek grammar makes
either meaning equally acceptable. So a
more accurate translation of Jesus’
teaching might be, “Don’t strike back at evil in kind.” Or, “don’t react
violently against the one who is evil.” This seems to be Paul’s understanding
of Jesus’ teaching (cf. Romans 12:17, 1 Thess. 5:15).
But what about Jesus’ three examples? Do they
substantiate this reading? Yes. In fact, when read carefully they offered
Jesus’ audience clear, imaginative, and surprising responses that engaged
oppressive evil. Let’s explore them together.
Example One: “If any one strikes you on the
right cheek, turn to him the other also.”
Why the right cheek? How does one strike another on the
right cheek anyway?
We must remember that this is a right-handed-world – the
right hand was the only hand that you could use because the left hand was used
only for unclean tasks. (Please don’t make me be more specific than that.
Suffice it to say, this was not a Charmin world.) In some communities, even to
gesture with the left hand could result in a penalty of exclusion and some form
of penance (see The Dead Sea Scrolls, 1QS 7). So, the only way one could strike
the right cheek with the right hand would be with the back of the hand. When we
recognize this we begin to understand that we are talking about an insult, a way
of belittling someone. The intention is not to injure with violence but to
humiliate or put someone in his or her place. So backhanding someone was a way
of admonishing inferiors: Masters backhanded slaves, husbands/wives;
parents/children; men/women; and Romans/Jews. So we have here in one simple
phrase a summary of a complex set of unequal relations in which retaliation
would be suicidal. The only response was cowering submission. To turn the other
cheek, however, created a dilemma for the would-be slapper and robbed him of
his power to humiliate. He can’t strike the left cheek in the same way because
he would be using his left hand, which was a punishable offense. If he hits
with a fist, according to Jewish sources, he’s basically acknowledging the lower
person as an equal. In that world of honor and shaming, the “superior” has been
rendered impotent to instill shame in a subordinate. He has been stripped of
his power to dehumanize the other. Jesus’ point is expressed well by Gandhi who said, “The first principle of
nonviolent action is that of non-cooperation with everything humiliating.”
Example #2: “If anyone wants to sue you for
your shirt, let him have your coat, too.”
The context of this example is that a person who has
borrowed money is being sued for his undergarment because he is so poor all he
has left are his shirt and coat – literally, the clothes on his back. At this
time, Jesus’ world was drowning in debt, due to the high taxation required by
Herod Antipas to pay Rome tribute. It is no accident that the first act of the
Jewish revolutionaries in 66 A.D. was to burn the temple treasury, where the
record of debts was kept.
Now, do you remember that the OT law actually envisioned
just such a scenario and declared that taking someone’s coat was forbidden
(Exodus 22:26-27, Deut. 24:12-13, cf. Amos 2:8)? If you took a man’s coat in
pledge for a loan you had to return it every night else what would he sleep in
when it gets cold? So in Jesus’ teaching the greedy lender sues you for the
only other piece of clothing he doesn’t have to return, your shirt. Jesus
counsels a shocking initiative: take off your coat
and your shirt and give them
both to the greedy person while you stand naked in the court (this is also a no
underwear world, sorry). Such an act would reveal the plaintiff’s greed and
expose an unjust system. Moreover, in Judaism, nakedness was taboo and shame
fell not on the naked person but on the person viewing or causing the nakedness
(Genesis 9:20-27). But this stripping
was more than punitive, it offered the creditor a chance to see what his greed
caused. In a striking parallel, shortly before the fall of political apartheid
in South Africa, police descended on a squatters' camp they had long wanted to
demolish. They gave the few women there five minutes to gather their
possessions, and then the bulldozers would level their shacks. The women seized
the initiative and stripped naked before the bulldozers. The police turned and
fled.
Example #3: “if anyone forces you to go
one mile, go also the second mile.”
In the third example, Jesus’ is acknowledging a particular
legal feature of the Roman Empire called Angaria, which involved compulsory
service among non-citizens in occupied territory, like Judea and Israel (this
is what happened to Simon of Cyrene, i.e. Mark 15:21-22; Matt. 27:32; Luke
23:26). Angaria allowed a Roman soldier to force a Jew to
carry his pack
for one mile. So the actual act referred to the oppression that an occupying
force had over a conquered people. In that context, Jesus is not simply saying,
“Do what he is forcing you to do, comply with oppression, and live with
powerless resentment.” Instead, he is instructing his followers to take the
initiative, and carry the pack further at their own volition. It shifts from
resentful powerlessness to the power of our own surprising initiative. We can
almost imagine a scenario by which the disciple of Jesus carrying the pack
further begins a conversation with the Roman soldier who is stunned by the act.
Maybe the soldier asks why he is doing that which would lead to a conversation
about Jesus, about the occupation and its impact on Jews, maybe even the
soldier talking about his family and where there was only hatred we see the
beginning of healing.
So what do we learn?
- If a saying is hard, get some help. Go to experts and look at the broader witness of Scripture. Paul expressed this same interpretation Romans 12:17-21 by quoting Proverbs 25:21-22, where it says we should feed our enemies when they are hungry and give them something to drink when they are thirsty and in doing so pour “burning coals on their heads”; that is, prick their conscience.
- Each of these examples includes an element of surprise and some subversive correction or naming of injustice without resorting to violence.
- They were meant to inspire peacemaking and justice which allows for the dignity of every human being and the conversion of enemies.
This does not mean we affirm everything our enemies do.
Jesus often confronted Pharisees and others leaders’ injustices. It does mean,
however, that we act in such a way that allows for our enemies conversion. Martin Luther King, Jr. understood Jesus
perfectly, “Love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy into a
friend.”
Of course, all of this is heading somewhere – the big
reveal, the big surprise – the most striking element of Jesus’ teaching, vss.
43 and 44. It’s not simply that we face injustice with nonviolent resistance
but that we do so in order to pray for and love our enemies because that’s what
God does. We do these things, “so that,”
Jesus says, “we can look like God.” Loving our enemies is our spiritual DNA.
Being a child of someone is a funny thing. To share the
genetic makeup of someone: to look like them and act like them. I’m a
delightful mixture of my parents – Dad 6ft., Mom 4 ft 11 in. I look just like
him and act just like her. I look so much like my dad that I’ve had complete
strangers come up to me and ask me if I was Gary Lemmond’s son. Do you want to
look like your Heavenly Father? Break the cycle of violence and retaliation in
working for justice. Resist wickedness. Refuse to hate. Pray for your enemies.
Loving them is a genetic trait of children of God, Jesus tells us. It’s how we
look like him.
Let’s return to the card for a moment. So where has
“Wait! What?” lead you today? What is Jesus calling you to do? How then should
you live?